The Wikimedia Foundation, the organisation responsible for Wikipedia, are currently holding elections for their Board of Trustees.

Personally, I dislike the Wikimedia Foundation in many ways because I find it overly bureaucratic by furtherly complicating Wikipedia/Wikimedia’s structure, they don’t much (not taking an active role) and quite possibly corrupt (see the Jimbo Wales, our “benevolent dictator for life”, controversies). It’s still arguable that there’s a need for a board, to defend Wikimedia against legal threats and see the administration of donations.

The Wikimedia Community can vote one member to the board for a one year term and this is the time of year we vote. Unless you’re a somewhat active user of a Wikimedia project (such as Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons or Wiktionary), you probably won’t be able to vote as you need 600 edits on one wiki prior to 1 March 2008 and 50 edits this year on that wiki before 29 May.

This year, there are 15 candidates and Wikimedia are employing preference-based voting using the Schulze method. I have to admit I don’t know any of the candidates, but they generally live in a different wikiworld to users like me!

Many of these candidates are present and active on multiple wikis, which improves their ‘chances’ as they’ll get votes from more and it shows they can communicate across wikis. Some Wikimedians seem to want Wikimedia to be more commercial whilst others seem to want the role of the board reduce.

And do excuse the very boring, very specialist post!