8 Reasons You Shouldn’t Use Disqus

Internet — Tags: , , , , — Joe Anderson @ 12:08 am Tuesday 22 July 2008

‘Blog in isolation’ published 25 reasons why we should use Disqus, the hot blog commenting community and management system of 20,000 blogs, which also isn’t short of funding. I, personally, don’t think it’s so ‘hot’ and I have a number of issues with the service.

Disqus looks nice, with threaded comments, shared profiles and email updates, but it hosts and manages your comments on an external site.

  1. It will slow my site down

    Remotely hosting my commenting means that for them to be viewed, I have to download them from another website and call them from a remote database. This, surely, reduces performance and increases pageload time.

  2. I don’t want to entrust my comments with someone else. They could get lost.

    If Disqus were to go bankrupt, what guarntees would I have that my comments would not be lost?

  3. Many things Disqus provide have already been provided elsewhere.

    Shared profiles: TypeKey. Gravatars: Gravatars. Threaded comments: This plugin. Editable comments: This plugin.

  4. Data protection.

    IANAL but surely it can’t be good to subject users to another privacy policy with servers in another jurisdiction. Who would be liable for any breaches in data protection?

  5. Disqus is not open source.

    There is an API, but it isn’t open source. Is it ever wise to use a system of which you cannot see the technical basis?

  6. It isn’t easy to migrate to and from.

    If I wanted to leave, I would have to find a way of transferring my comments. Disqus doesn’t complement your current comment system, like coComment does, but replaces it.

  7. Disqus is a company. They want to make money. They could serve ads on your sites.

    Disqus have the technical capacity to serve adverts on your site, as they could put them in comments or send them along with the comments to be displayed. You’d have to trust them.

  8. It is a fad which will probably fade out, meaning more work for you as you migrate back.

    Do you remember that fantastic coComment service we all used to use? Its Alexa rank says you don’t.

How would you describe modern technology to a 18th century farmer?

Misc. — Tags: — Joe Anderson @ 10:41 pm Saturday 26 April 2008

Technology develops so fast. I doubt that in 200 years time, we could relate to their technology. Whilst it would probably be easy enough to explain and describe a CD to someone in 1950 (a type of record which uses light to convert the stored music into sound?), how about describing that to a 1750s farmer?

So, some challenges for commenters:

  1. A computer
  2. An iPod
  3. A camera
  4. A TV
  5. A Nintendo Wii
  6. A Nintendo DS
  7. Twitter
  8. SMS

Some, obviously, are easier than others. I would guess the game consoles are probably the hardest.

Do excuse how random this post is; I will have a review of a phone online tomorrow!

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Licence. (c) 2010 Webby’s World | Privacy Policy | Powered by WordPress
Designed by Comma Dot Colon on the Barecity theme.