<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crowd sourcing: Has it failed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joeanderson.co.uk/blog/2008/05/14/crowd-sourcing-has-it-failed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joeanderson.co.uk/blog/2008/05/14/crowd-sourcing-has-it-failed/</link>
	<description>A blog by a Brit about Web 2.0, the Internet and technology in general.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:41:43 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Guthrie</title>
		<link>http://joeanderson.co.uk/blog/2008/05/14/crowd-sourcing-has-it-failed/comment-page-1/#comment-284069</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Guthrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeanderson.co.uk/blog/2008/05/14/crowd-sourcing-has-it-failed/#comment-284069</guid>
		<description>I like the idea of crowd sourcing.  I would even visit Cambrian House whenever I could to browse the new ideas.

I think the difference between Cambrian House and &quot;working&quot; crowdsourcing projects like Wikipedia is focus.  In the example of Wikipedia, all the users are focused on one idea.  Their efforts and thoughts are focused.  I think Cambrian House would have been more effective if everyone would have voted on one or two ideas at a time and then focused on carrying those two ideas out.. documenting the process along the way.

I hope that crowd sourcing continues on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of crowd sourcing.  I would even visit Cambrian House whenever I could to browse the new ideas.</p>
<p>I think the difference between Cambrian House and &#8220;working&#8221; crowdsourcing projects like Wikipedia is focus.  In the example of Wikipedia, all the users are focused on one idea.  Their efforts and thoughts are focused.  I think Cambrian House would have been more effective if everyone would have voted on one or two ideas at a time and then focused on carrying those two ideas out.. documenting the process along the way.</p>
<p>I hope that crowd sourcing continues on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
