Why don’t Microsoft allow Windows to be properly customised?

Software — Tags: — Joe Anderson @ 8:33 pm Thursday 29 November 2007

For over a decade, Windows has featured customisation through ‘themes’ but this never is equal to the degree of customisation offered by software such as WindowsBlinds. Windows users often wow when they say a machine running WindowsBlinds, so why don’t Microsoft ship Windows with a similar feature?

Surely the naive public would be even more impressed by Vista’s eyecandy if they could actually choose how their operating system looks. Instead, they have to pay $20 for a bit of shareware they probably didn’t even realise existed!

For the next Windows, perhaps Microsoft should provide a truly customisable UI. Consumers to corporations would all love placing their own branding on their installation and it’d break that Windows feeling of uniformity!

3 Comments »

  1. “For the next Windows, perhaps Microsoft should provide a truly customisable UI. Consumers to corporations would all love placing their own branding on their installation and it’d break that Windows feeling of uniformity!”

    sure man! in other 6 or 7 years! what a wonderfull OS…doesn’t it?

    Comment by vladimir prieto — 30 November 2007 @ 11:51 am
  2. Agreed - the more customisation we can put into products the better we’ll appreciate our surroundings and ultimately be more productive.

    Comment by Ryan — 6 December 2007 @ 11:01 am
  3. Windows XP Embedded allows this already (and also allows granular control over which WinXP Pro components you want to include). It just isn’t available for consumers to purchase.

    Comment by Andy Kant — 10 December 2007 @ 11:52 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Licence. (c) 2008 Webby’s World | Privacy Policy | Powered by WordPress
Designed by Comma Dot Colon on the Barecity theme.