<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Everything that can be invented has been invented&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joeanderson.co.uk/blog/2007/07/29/everything-that-can-be-invented-has-been-invented/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joeanderson.co.uk/blog/2007/07/29/everything-that-can-be-invented-has-been-invented/</link>
	<description>A blog by a Brit about Web 2.0, the Internet and technology in general.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:19:02 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://joeanderson.co.uk/blog/2007/07/29/everything-that-can-be-invented-has-been-invented/comment-page-1/#comment-180837</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 20:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeanderson.co.uk/blog/2007/07/29/everything-that-can-be-invented-has-been-invented/#comment-180837</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with you on that. Sooner or later people are going to hate reading 20 posts everyday about the next digg killer! or video site. Mashable is now going more into providing &quot;toolbox&quot; posts, probably too get more diggs, as they themselves probably see a redundancy themselves to Web 2.0.

I don&#039;t write about every startup that wants free coverage. I like to write comparative posts now, though they take longer to write, but in the end you feel good about yourself.

As for digg, it&#039;s become more or less a groupie and iphone site rather than a web 2.0 site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with you on that. Sooner or later people are going to hate reading 20 posts everyday about the next digg killer! or video site. Mashable is now going more into providing &#8220;toolbox&#8221; posts, probably too get more diggs, as they themselves probably see a redundancy themselves to Web 2.0.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t write about every startup that wants free coverage. I like to write comparative posts now, though they take longer to write, but in the end you feel good about yourself.</p>
<p>As for digg, it&#8217;s become more or less a groupie and iphone site rather than a web 2.0 site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
