Microsoft Office 12

Software — Joe Anderson @ 8:25 pm Monday 31 October 2005

I’ve managed to lay my hands on a copy of the upcoming release, . I’ll be taking you through my first impressions.

Office 12 didn’t take very long to install, no more than 10 minutes to install Pro, but I haven’t timed how long it took to install other programs like Frontpage.. But then again, I’m on a quite high-end machine (1.5GB RAM, Athlon 64 3400+, 250GB SATA…) so I don’t know how long it would take on a slower machine. The install interface is very good looking, and from very early on you realise the software is going to be very cosmetically different to previous versions.

Microsoft WordThe most commonly used program in Office is probably Microsoft Word, and this was the first program opened. At first you wouldn’t recognise it even as a Windows program. It seems to have the style of an Apple and Linux product – however the use of blue gives it a way a little. However, it looks nothing like Office 2003.

In Word tasks like making things into columns can be done in three easy clicks. You have lost menus such as Options and Tables in return for more useful menus such as Page Layout and Write.

Also, there aren’t as many drop-down menus, it comprises many of horizontal based menus called ribbon menus with great graphics. However I feel that adding items such as References and Review to the main menu is a bad move – I don’t know a single person you uses these features.

Another thing which is noticeable – but not quite as much – is the smaller title bar and smaller close, minimise, maximise and restore buttons.This does look out of place

Despite the heavy cosmetic changes made on the main areas boxes such as spell checker and options look very out of place. I hope Microsoft decide to change this. (see right).

Also, Office 12 sees a new file format docx, this format is only openable in Office 12 as it uses an XML based file format. However, if you wish you can change it from saving to this by default to saving .doc by default; which is best as not many people can read docx.

I’m not much of an Excel user, so I can’t really compare it much to previous versions – however one thing I can say is like Word, it looks far better. Also, it provides a better layout.

By default it now displays a page layout view when Excel loads. You can switch between views in a similar manner as you could in previous Excel versions.

In what I can see no changes have been made to formulae formating since Office 2003.

I have to take note it is easier to import data from Access databases, the web and flat-text files. It is very easy to import external data and then update it – this can be done with a built-in web browser. One bug I’ve noticed is though on links which open in a new windows it loads IE.  This could prove useful with changing statistics and calculations. However it doesn’t seem good at fetching small pieces of pages, but better at pages at a whole.

Other features I’ve never seen before include What-If Analysis and Text To Columns. Also, the file format is xlsx by default, but you can easily change this. Excel has almost as good bug handling as well.

Moving on again, I shall now move to Powerpoint. Like Word and Excel, Powerpoint has being re-skinned. However it’s interface is a little different, even excluding the ribbon menu. I feel a little disorientated as I can’t right click to do things like Custom Animation. To do this I have to go in the animation menu.

PowerPointIn Powerpoint many of the icons in the menu are pixelated and/or low quality. This seems to let the application down. Like previous versions of powerpoint you have Slide Designs but it has had it’s name changed to Themes. I forgot to mention this but you can theme Excel and Word files. You can also do many colour scheme effects.

I also find it easy to do such things as recording my voice. It is easy for people with two monitors to present a presentation, it has the Presenter View. I don’t have two monitors so I haven’t tested this feature.

Also, PowerPoint outputs as PPTX by default

Microsoft Publisher looks almost identical to the version in OfficePublisher 12 2003. There’s a few cosmetic Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.ustweaks – especially in the Publication Type windows which has fantastic graphics. However, I believe in a later build of Office 12 this will be tweaked.

Due to this I can’t really say too much about how great it is, because nothing much has changed.

Unlike most other applications in Office 12 Publisher outputs in it’s usual format: .pub .

Microsoft Access has also been reskinned similar to Word, Excel and PowerPoint. Like Excel you can capture external data. There is more options though, and you can import XML, SharePoint, Excel and various other formats; but not data from the World Wide Web. That really does spoil the prospect of a highly dynamic database.

Other un-prettified application include InfoPath, which I can’t see any changes with whatsoever. Outlook also looks exactly the same. But of a dull ending

I don’t generally like Microsoft, but I’m impressed with some of these applications. Microsoft has seemed to realise users don’t want the XP interface, but something even more futuristic. I wonder how long it is until a CSI style OS is made. It will be good to see the other programs made to match Word, Excel and PowerPoint menus.

11 Comments »

  1. What about Outlook?

    Comment by Aaron Brazell — 31 October 2005 @ 8:30 pm
  2. Aaron Brazell: I said I couldn’t see any major changes to outlook.

    Other un-prettified application include InfoPath, which I can?t see any changes with whatsoever. Outlook also looks exactly the same. But of a dull ending

    Comment by Joe Anderson — 31 October 2005 @ 8:35 pm
  3. Flickr Shows Microsoft Word 12

    (Image) Microsoft Word 12, originally uploaded by computerjoe.

    Trackback by Whattal (what.ticio.us) — 31 October 2005 @ 9:08 pm
  4. Wow, Office 12 does look really cool and certainly a lot better than Office 2003. It is nice to have a change in graphics and UI every one in a while as creating documents can be boring.

    Do you know when it is going to be released?

    Comment by Alex Newman — 31 October 2005 @ 10:41 pm
  5. I’d use it for its new features rather than for the cosmetic changes. I don’t mind how something looks so long as I can use it.

    All in all it sounds way better than what I’m currently using.

    BA~~19

    Comment by Deb — 1 November 2005 @ 3:52 am
  6. Looking good there. How much disk space does it need?

    Comment by Ambiguous Wanderer — 1 November 2005 @ 12:53 pm
  7. Ambiguous Wanderer: I looked in the folder it’s in and it’s about ~600MB currently, though I haven’t installed things such as a flowchart program. The ISO it was on was ~1.2GB

    Comment by Joe Anderson — 1 November 2005 @ 3:45 pm
  8. Urgh, still a space hogger. Those extra features better be useful.

    Comment by Ambiguous Wanderer — 1 November 2005 @ 5:50 pm
  9. Nah there are some good additions to Outlook. Nothing groundbreaking but the calendar has been improved quite a bit, showing tasks related to the day is really good.

    I like the To-Do bar. Flags and Categories have also been improved and are now a lot more usable. Note fields in tasks and contact forms now have auto spellchecking and advanced formatting.

    It isn?t going to change the world but it?s definitely better.

    Comment by weevil — 2 November 2005 @ 5:11 pm
  10. [...] Once you’ve downloaded it, if you already have MS Office 12 or any program associated with DOCX make sure you are in the folder view which displays file extensions (you do this by going into Control Panel>Folder Options>View>And Unchecking Hide Extensions for Known File Types). Then, go into the folder containing test.docx. In the folder ensure it does have the file extension, if it doesn’t, please follow the above steps! [...]

    Pingback by Webby’s World » Dismantling a DOCX — 28 January 2006 @ 12:23 pm
  11. Hi, where can I get my hands on the iso for Office 12

    Comment by Pierre — 13 February 2006 @ 2:36 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Licence. (c) 2008 Webby’s World | Privacy Policy | Powered by WordPress
Designed by Comma Dot Colon on the Barecity theme.